How Governments Use Lottery Revenue to Balance Budgets


A lottery is a game in which players pay a small sum of money and try to match numbers or symbols to those randomly drawn by a machine. Governments have mixed feelings on lotteries, some outlawing them, others endorse and regulate them. In the United States, lotteries are popular, with people paying to enter games for prizes ranging from instant-win scratch-off tickets to daily numbers games in which participants pick six or more numbers.

The word “lottery” comes from the Middle Dutch word loten, which may be a calque on Old French lotier, or a rephrasing of the Latin verb lotio, meaning “to cast lots.” Probably the first public lotteries were held in the Low Countries in the 15th century, with records of them appearing in the towns of Ghent and Utrecht. These were used for a variety of purposes, including raising money for town fortifications and poor relief.

Lotteries are popular partly because of an inextricable human urge to gamble and hope for the best. They can also give the illusion of wealth and a good life in an age of inequality and limited social mobility. In addition, many people see the lottery as a civic duty to support state programs and services. This is especially true during times of economic stress, when the prospect of tax increases or budget cuts can be especially unpopular.

One way that governments promote lotteries is by describing them as a source of revenue for specific programs, such as education. This argument has some validity, but it can be misleading. It tends to underestimate the overall size of state revenues and it overlooks the fact that the proceeds from lotteries are a small portion of these funds.

In reality, the majority of state revenue comes from personal and corporate income taxes, sales and excise taxes, and property and business taxes. In addition, state spending on programs such as higher education and health care are more than offset by the revenues from lotteries. The lottery, therefore, does not have a significant impact on the overall size of state governments’ budgets.

Nevertheless, it does provide a convenient source of income for state governments, and they can use it to help balance their budgets. In general, the amount of money the lottery returns to winners is more than half of the total pool of ticket sales. The remainder is used to fund other state programs and services.

Another issue with lottery proceeds is that the legislature can “earmark” them to be spent on certain programs. However, the amount of money “earmarked” this way merely reduces the appropriations that the legislature would have otherwise had to allot for those programs from its general funds. Critics point out that this practice is deceptive and allows the legislature to avoid cutting other state programs and services in favor of funding lotteries. It is not clear whether the popularity of the lottery will continue to rise if state governments are forced to cut other programs in order to maintain this funding arrangement.

Comments are closed.